The Army considered this as non-compliance with military customs, specifically in a regiment exactly where these types of rituals are observed as Portion of device bonding and morale. It had been argued that his refusal to participate could negatively influence cohesion within the regiment.The Supreme Court has upheld the dismissal of the Christian

In search of to dispel the notion which the officer was “cantankerous”, Sankaranarayanan explained there was just one infraction, and just the commandant had a dilemma with it, not the opposite troops. He mentioned Kamalesan experienced no issue getting into the Sarva Dharma Sthal.The Supreme Court has upheld the dismissal of a Christian Army s

Justice Bagchi identified which the officer experienced, in his reply, admitted that other Christian officers explained “remember to do it, there is not any issue”. “But your interpretation of the religious legal rights is ‘I'm not heading to supply flowers or havan inside of a gurudwara’.Noting that he commanded Sikh, Jat and Rajput troo